Invest in UCSF campus social workers: A win for All San Franciscans
The overdose emergency in San Francisco remains relentless, with 635 accidental overdose deaths in 2024 and a preliminary 624 in 2025, including 451 and 467 fentanyl-involved deaths, respectively.¹ UCSF “Campus” clinical social workers are a frontline safety net. Citywide serves 1,500+ clients per year (40% Black & Latinx, 70% actively using substances, 100% serious mental illness)²—yet these roles are often grant-funded/at-risk and paid about 33% less,³ with shorter median tenure (2.95 vs. 4.5 years)⁴, undermining continuity of care when the city can least afford turnover.
Sign our petition!
-
“Campus” social workers are employed at the University of California, San Francisco’s Campus clinics, San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, the Division of Citywide Case Management Programs, the UC San Francisco Trauma Recovery Center, the Division of Substance Abuse and Addiction Medicine, the UC San Francisco Alliance Health Project, among many others. Their patients have serious mental illness, substance use disorders, and various forms of severe trauma. Many of them are underinsured and may be unhoused.
Citywide Case Management, one of the many programs staffed by Campus clinical social workers, serves over 1,500 clients annually. Patients are 40% Black & Latinx, 70% actively using substances, and 100% experiencing serious mental illness.¹
40% of Campus clinical social workers are in the lowest Master’s level title (excludes per diems).
Work in settings like San Francisco General Hospital and Trauma Center, which derive the majority of their funding from the California Medical Assistance Program (Medi-Cal).
“Medical Center” social workers are employed primarily at the UCSF Helen Diller Medical Center at Parnassus Heights, the UCSF Medical Center at Mission Bay, the UCSF Medical Center at Mount Zion, the UCSF Langley Porter Psychiatric Hospital, and the UCSF Nancy Friend Pritzker Psychiatry Building. They are funded through UCSF Health and have patient populations that are almost fifty percent white,² with large percentages (33% to over 50%) of patients insured through private third-party insurers.³⁴
Primarily at UCSF Parnassus, Mission Bay, Mt. Zion, and the Langley Porter Psychiatric Hospital. Almost 50% of patients are white, and a large share is insured through third-party insurers.⁵
There is one Medical Center clinical social worker at the lowest Master’s-level title.
Work in settings where no more than 22%, and as little as 0%, of revenue is from Medi-Cal.⁶
Footnotes
University of California, San Francisco, “Citywide Case Management,” accessed February 26, 2026, https://citywide.ucsf.edu/.
University of California, San Francisco, “Patient Demographics,” Enterprise Dashboards (dashboard), data accessed August 2024, https://dashboards.ucsf.edu/dashboards/patient-demographics.
University Professional and Technical Employees CWA Local 9119 (UPTE CWA 9119), “Juris files,” Healthcare Professionals (HX) bargaining unit, accessed January 5, 2026.
California Department of Health Care Access and Information, “UCSF Medical Center,” Hospital Profile, accessed February 26, 2026, https://hcai.ca.gov/facility/ucsf-medical-center/.
California Department of Health Care Access and Information, “UCSF Medical Center,” Hospital Profile, accessed February 26, 2026, https://hcai.ca.gov/facility/ucsf-medical-center/.
California Department of Health Care Access and Information, “UCSF Medical Center,” Hospital Profile, accessed February 26, 2026, https://hcai.ca.gov/facility/ucsf-medical-center/.
-
Stabilize streets & transit by guiding 1,500+ unhoused or high-risk clients away from EDs and jails.
Reduce public-health costs through early intervention that prevents costly hospital readmissions.
Strengthen hospital flow—fewer psychiatric bottlenecks mean shorter wait times for every patient.
Deliver specialty outpatient care—Trauma Recovery Center (TRC), AIDS Health Project (AHP), Intensive Pain Program (IPP), and Child & Adolescent Services (CAS)—so patients stay healthy and out of crisis without returning to the ED.
-
City leaders and the University of California, San Francisco, can secure healthier, safer neighborhoods by:
Close the 33 % pay gap so experienced clinical social workers stay on the job.
Add Campus clinical social workers to UC San Francisco’s operating budget for stable, long-term care.
Ensure safe staffing and worksites so clinical social workers can focus on serving the public
Unequal pay hurts public health
Clinical social workers are indispensable guardians of community well-being. After years of graduate study and supervised practice, they provide frontline mental health care that has a ripple effect across families and neighborhoods. Yet, UC San Francisco’s much-touted single pay scale masks a two-tier reality—campus and community clinicians are routinely hired onto lower steps than their hospital-based peers, even though the formal salary ranges are identical.
| Campus Clinical Social Workers | Medical Center CSWs | |
|---|---|---|
| Core mission | Community-based, inpatient & outpatient UCSF mental-health programs affiliated with SFGH (Citywide, TRC, AHP, Ward 86, Methadone Clinic, CAS, PES, EDCM) | Inpatient & ambulatory healthcare coordination, therapeutic engagement, and discharge planning at UCSF hospitals & mental-health treatment centers (e.g., Langley Porter Psychiatric Hospital, Pritzker Psychiatry Building) |
| Average pay | 33% lower—drives turnover | Competitive |
| Position stability | Grant-funded, at risk | UCSF-budgeted, permanent |
| Community impact | Rising behavioral & mental-health crises, Continuous UCSF Health bottlenecks from preventable hospitalizations, all San Franciscans feel the effects of rising crises and service gaps | |
See the difference in UC’s two-tier care system
Note: Campus and medical center pay scales are identical, but placement by HR/dept varies greatly.
| Credentials | Campus Clinical Social Worker | Medical Center CSWs | Difference | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Title & Steps | Wage ($/hr) | Title & Steps | Wage ($/hr) | $/hr and % |
|
| Bachelor’s degree | Social worker associate, Step 1 |
$33.18 | — | — | — |
| Master’s degree; Provisional License (ASW, AMFT, APCC) |
CSW1, Step 8* | $48.60 | CSW2, Step 19 | $61.89 | $13.29 27.3% |
| Fully licensed (LCSW, LMFT, LPCC) | CSW2, Step 11 | $52.83 | CSW3, Step 22 | $70.67 | $17.84 33.77% |
*As of September 2023, the campus entry level was raised to CSW1, Step 8. The prior entry-level placement was CSW 1, Step 1 ($37.56/hr), making a $18.55/hr or 49.39% difference.
The result is stark salary gaps of roughly 27–33 percent for provisionally or fully licensed staff. This shortfall does more than undermine professional sustainability—it drives experienced clinicians away from the very low-income and minority communities that already face the greatest barriers to care. Closing these disparities is therefore a matter of the common good: fair, equitable compensation strengthens the behavioral-health workforce, safeguards continuity of care, and aligns UCSF’s practices with its public mission to advance health equity for all.
A tale of two social workers
(same degree, very different pay and career path)
This example compares two new graduates from a Master of Social Work (MSW) program who both have 0 hours of post-graduate clinical experience. The key difference is where they work at UCSF:
“Mica” is hired into a campus clinic role (university side).
“Morgan” is hired into a medical center role (UCSF Health).
First, a few terms to know:
BBS = California’s Board of Behavioral Sciences, which issues social work registration and licenses.
ASW number = the BBS registration number for an Associate Clinical Social Worker (a required step before full licensure).
LCSW = Licensed Clinical Social Worker (fully licensed).
Steps = pay levels within a job classification (higher step = higher hourly pay).
1) Right after graduation (before the BBS number arrives)
Campus clinic (Mica):
Until she receives her ASW number, she can only be hired as a Social Work Associate, step 1–2: $33.18–$33.86/hr.
She may still be expected to do clinical social worker–level work, but she cannot be reclassified as a Clinical Social Worker (CSW) until the number arrives.
That wait is typically about 3 months, and it can take up to 12 months for applicants with a prior incarceration.
Medical center (Morgan):
Morgan is hired immediately as a Clinical Social Worker 2, step 19: $61.89/hr.
Pay gap at this stage:
$28.71/hr more for Morgan (about 86.5% higher than Mica’s $33.18/hr rate).
2) Once the provisional BBS number is received
Campus clinic (Mica):
Once she receives her provisional number, she can be reclassified to CSW 1, step 8: $48.60/hr.
Medical center (Morgan):
No change: $61.89/hr.
Pay gap at this stage:
$13.29/hr more for Morgan (about 27.3% higher).
3) After two years (when full licensure becomes possible)
Campus clinic (Mica):
After two years, she is CSW 1, step 9, and becomes eligible to take the licensing exam.
From the date BBS confirms she’s eligible for the exam, she can reclassify to CSW 2—but she can only move up two steps, landing at CSW 2, step 11: $52.83/hr.
Medical center (Morgan):
Morgan is CSW 2, step 20.
He passes his clinical exam and becomes an LCSW.
He is then reclassified to CSW 3, at minimum step 22: $70.67/hr.
Pay gap at this stage:
$17.84/hr more for Morgan (about 33.8% higher).
4) “Breaking the glass ceiling” (access to CSW 3 roles)
Retention and tenure differences (what tends to happen overall):
About half of campus social workers leave UCSF in under 3 years, compared with about one-third of medical center social workers.
40% of medical center social workers have stayed at UCSF more than 6 years, compared with just over 20% of campus social workers.
Median tenure: campus social workers 2.95 years vs. medical center social workers 4.5 years.³
Campus clinic (Mica):
Mica asks to move up to CSW 3 but is told it isn’t possible in her clinic.
Years later, her manager creates one CSW 3 opening that includes extra projects and supervisory duties.
Mica has to compete against coworkers for that single spot.
She gets it and becomes CSW 3, step 13: $59.13/hr. Her colleagues who applied but didn’t get it remain CSW 2.
Medical center (Morgan):
Morgan can remain a CSW 3, step 22: $70.67/hr without needing to take on program-management duties just to access the classification.
Pay gap at this stage:
$11.54/hr more for Morgan (about 19.5% higher).
Bottom line
In this example, two social workers start with the same education and the same experience, but the campus pathway involves delays tied to licensing paperwork, slower reclassification, and limited access to higher-level roles, while the medical center pathway can place workers into higher classifications and higher pay much earlier, with clearer access to CSW 3.
Sign our petition!
End UCSF’s Two‑Tier Mental‑Health Pay System
For decades, the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) has systematically placed clinical social workers (CSWs) who serve in community-based clinics—represented by University Professional and Technical Employees CWA Local 9119 (UPTE-CWA 9119)—into lower-paying classifications than peers hired into UCSF Health’s medical centers.
Although our collective-bargaining agreement provides a single CSW wage structure, managers assign different job codes and step placements based solely on the clinic where a CSW is hired. Despite qualifications equal to or exceeding those of their colleagues in UCSF Health facilities, community-based CSWs are misclassified and placed on lower steps of the pay scale; on average, they earn 33 percent less than CSWs at the Medical Center. This inequitable practice contradicts UCSF’s PRIDE Values (Professionalism, Respect, Integrity, Diversity, and Excellence) and persists even as the University profits from indirect costs and other revenues tied to the grants that fund many community-clinic positions.
UCSF’s pay inequities for community-based CSWs reinforce broader barriers to mental-health access for historically marginalized communities. Community teams experience dangerously high turnover rates as CSWs seek higher pay elsewhere to match their training and clinical expertise. When clinicians leave, those who remain face unsustainable caseloads, longer patient wait times, and worsening clinician-to-patient ratios—all of which reduce access to care and further fuel turnover.
We recognize the invaluable contributions of UCSF’s community-based CSWs, who work tirelessly to treat San Franciscans and Bay Area residents living with serious mental illness, substance-use disorders, and severe trauma. They also provide trauma-informed outreach on the streets and in cars, jails, and shelters to connect individuals with essential resources. These programs are vital to bridging generational inequities in mental-health access for historically marginalized communities.
We, the undersigned, denounce UCSF’s inequitable hiring, classification, reclassification, and step-placement practices for community-based CSWs. We urge UCSF to reclassify existing CSWs to steps commensurate with their experience and to implement a uniform hiring and classification policy across all mental- and behavioral-health titles at UCSF.
Footnotes
City and County of San Francisco, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, Report on 2024 Accidental Overdose Deaths (San Francisco, March 18, 2025); City and County of San Francisco, Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, Report on 2025 Accidental Overdose Deaths (San Francisco, February 13, 2026). (San Francisco Media API)
University of California, San Francisco, “Citywide Case Management,” accessed February 26, 2026, https://citywide.ucsf.edu/.
University Professional and Technical Employees CWA Local 9119 (UPTE CWA 9119), “Juris files,” Healthcare Professionals (HX) bargaining unit, accessed January 5, 2026.
University Professional and Technical Employees CWA Local 9119 (UPTE CWA 9119), “Juris files,” Healthcare Professionals (HX) bargaining unit, accessed February 26, 2026.